Legal Opinion

Perry v. Haritos

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided March 1, 1924PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, C. J.

The direction of the verdict and a single ruling upon evidence, are the questions we are asked to review upon this appeal. The court directed the verdict upon two grounds: (1) that the plaintiff had failed to prove that the decedent Perry was free from contributory negligence, and (2) that Hawley, the driver of this truck, was not at the time of this accident in the execution of the defendant’s business within the scope of his employment. The right of the jury to find negligence upon the part of this driver as a proximate cause of this accident, is conceded by the defendant’s counsel, so that…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Mitchum v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1852
  2. Ritchie v. WallerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1893
  3. Starcher v. South Penn Oil Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Eby v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
  5. Morse v. Consolidated Railway Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1908

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. State v. KirbySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
  2. Carten v. CartenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
  3. State v. WargoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
  4. Cascella v. Jay James Camera Shop, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
  5. State v. ChesneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API