Legal Opinion

Matulis v. Gans

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided May 4, 1928PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaines, J.

The plaintiff alleged that on the afternoon of December 20th, 1925, while he was walking on Farmington Avenue, New Britain, in the exercise of due care, one Inturisi negligently drove an automobile against him causing him serious bodily injury; that Inturisi was at the time the agent and servant of ithe defendant, Gans, and acting within the scope of his agency and service. The defendant made a general denial, a jury found the issues for the defendant, and the plaintiff appealed for claimed errors and omissions in the charge to the jury.

One of the important questions before the jury was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Town of Ansonia v. CooperSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1894
  2. Brown v. New Haven Taxicab Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1919
  3. Condron v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
  4. Tetreault v. Connecticut Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1909
  5. Tombari v. ConnorsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Caswell v. Maplewood GarageSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1930
  2. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. South Windsor Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
  3. Middletown Trust Co. v. BregmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
  4. Cyclone Fence Co. v. McAvineySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
  5. Peterson v. MeehanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API