Legal Opinion

Petersen v. Petersen, No. Fa 95 547879 (Sep. 19, 1997)

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided September 19, 1997No. FA 95 547879Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]MEMORANDUM OF DECISION The plaintiff has filed a "Motion to Reargue/Clarify" various aspects of my memorandum of decision dissolving the parties' marriage and entering certain financial orders. At my direction the parties have briefed the issue of my authority to reconsider any of the orders I entered, in response to the plaintiff's motion.

Obviously, a motion to clarify permits nothing more than what it suggests, a clarification not an alteration of orders entered. See Rosato v. Rosato, 40 Conn. App. 533 (1996). The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jaser v. JaserConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
  2. Rosato v. RosatoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
  3. K. A. Thompson Electric Co. v. Wesco, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API