Connecticut National Bank v. Investors Capital Corp.

Although I agree with the result the majority reaches, I file a concurrence to point out my belief that there is no procedure that allows a motion to reargue.

*58In its rendition of the facts, the majority states correctly that on October 3, 1991, “the defendants filed . . . a‘motion to reargue the order disclosing assets.’ Nothing was mentioned in the motion to reargue concerning the orders of default and nonsuit. . . . The trial court . . . denied the . . . motion to reargue.” I believe our continuing recognition of a “motion” that “no statute or trial court rule of practice specifically…