Legal Opinion
Goldstein v. Enoch
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 28, 1967No. Civ. 30939PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFourt, J.
Milton Goldstein appeals from an order of the superior court dismissing his action against Herbert Enoch after Enoch’s general demurrer to the complaint was sustained without leave to amend.
The first cause of action discloses that Goldstein is an attorney who owned, at all times herein relevant, 20 percent of the stock of R.R.R. Inc., a California corporation. Enoch owned the remaining 80 percent. On or about March 8, 1964, Enoch proposed to Goldstein that he might be able to sell all the stock for a price which would return Goldstein $100,000 for his share, but in order to do so he would…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Faulkner v. California Toll Bridge AuthorityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Stigall v. City of TaftCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Schaefer v. BerinsteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Steiner v. RowleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Union Collection Co. v. BuckmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Zumbrun v. University of Southern CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Kelly v. General Telephone Co.California Court of Appeal · 1982
- Keithley v. Civil Service BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Louisville Title Insurance v. Surety Title & Guaranty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1976
- Manti v. GunariCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970