Legal Opinion

Erickson v. Marsh & McLennan Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided February 5, 1990PublishedCited by 209 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

GARIBALDI, J.

This appeal presents an unusual question of what constitutes a cognizable claim of reverse sex discrimination under the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination, N.J.S.A. 10:5-1 to -42 (LAD). Plaintiff John Erickson claims he was the victim of sexual discrimination in that his employer, defendant Marsh & McLennan Co., Inc. (M & M) discharged him because of a romantic consensual relationship between his supervisor and a female employee. This appeal also addresses whether an employer, in responding to inquiries from prospective employers…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by209 opinions

  1. Lehmann v. Toys 'R' US, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
  2. Reed Waldron v. Sl Industries, Inc. Sl-Waber, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  3. Bergen Commercial Bank v. SislerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
  4. Young v. Schering Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  5. Kuwik v. Starmark Star Marketing & Administration, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1993

204 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API