Erickson v. Marsh & McLennan Co.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
GARIBALDI, J.
This appeal presents an unusual question of what constitutes a cognizable claim of reverse sex discrimination under the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination, N.J.S.A. 10:5-1 to -42 (LAD). Plaintiff John Erickson claims he was the victim of sexual discrimination in that his employer, defendant Marsh & McLennan Co., Inc. (M & M) discharged him because of a romantic consensual relationship between his supervisor and a female employee. This appeal also addresses whether an employer, in responding to inquiries from prospective employers…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by209 opinions
- Lehmann v. Toys 'R' US, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
- Reed Waldron v. Sl Industries, Inc. Sl-Waber, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Bergen Commercial Bank v. SislerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
- Young v. Schering Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
- Kuwik v. Starmark Star Marketing & Administration, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1993
204 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.