Legal Opinion
Blackman v. Kristovich
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 3, 1963No. Civ. 26728PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFox, P. J.
Mrs. Sadie Jean Blackman has appealed from (1) an order denying her motion to vacate a final decree of divorce granted her, and (2) a subsequent order denying her motion for reconsideration of her previous motion.
Appellant’s original motion to vacate was based upon the ground that the final decree of divorce previously granted her was procured by extrinsic fraud, assertedly practiced on her and on the court, by her husband, Aviv Blackman, now deceased, and by duress of Blackman exercised on her.
The facts before the court below are contained in two declarations in support of the original…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Raps v. RapsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Hamburger v. HamburgerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Katz v. KarlssonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Kallgren v. SteeleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Fibreboard Paper Products Corp. v. East Bay Union of MacHinists, Local 1304California Court of Appeal · 1964
- Rich v. State Board of OptometryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Coronet Credit Corp. v. West Thrift Co.California Court of Appeal · 1966
- Grover v. TindallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- People v. Ruben M.California Court of Appeal · 1979