Legal Opinion
Caruso v. City of Milford
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided February 11, 2003No. AC 22615PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FOTI, J.
The plaintiffs, Carisa Caruso and Lisa Caruso,1 appeal from the judgment of the trial court granting the motion for summary judgment filed by the defendant board of education of the city of Milford.2 The dispositive issue on appeal is whether the court improperly concluded that the plaintiffs’ failure to cite a statutory basis for abrogating the defendant’s govem*97mental immunity barred the action as a matter of law.3 We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts and procedural histoiy are relevant to the plaintiffs’ appeal. On September 15, 1997, Carisa Caruso…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Heyman Associates No. 1 v. Insurance Co. of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Elliott v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Pion v. Southern New England Telephone Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1997
- Wei Ping Wu v. Town of FairfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Murphy v. IvesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1963
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Gaudino v. Town of East HartfordConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Caruso v. City of MilfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Colon v. EulizierDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2023
- Colon v. EulizierDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2023
- Skrobacz v. SweeneyConnecticut Superior Court · 2003