Legal Opinion

Bryan v. Bank of America

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 12, 2001No. A088787PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KLINE, P. J.

This appeal having previously been dismissed, appellant moves to recall the remittitur. Respondents not only oppose the motion but request the imposition of sanctions on appellant’s counsel for factual misrepresentations made to the court. The request for sanctions raises the legal question whether an appellate court has inherent authority to impose sanctions in the form of attorney fees against an attorney for factual misrepresentations or the violation of court rules. We shall conclude that we have such authority and that its exercise is warranted in this case. We shall…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Roadway Express, Inc. v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Morton M. Hill, Jr. v. Norfolk and Western Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
  5. Bauguess v. PaineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Olmstead v. Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.California Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Keitel v. HeubelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  3. Casaccio v. CurtissWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Campagnone v. Enjoyable Pools & Spas Service & Repairs, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2008
  5. Dana Commercial Credit Corp. v. Ferns & FernsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API