Legal Opinion

Stephen Slesinger, Inc. v. Walt Disney Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 25, 2007No. B178340PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WILLHITE, Acting P. J.

In this case of first impression in California, we hold that when a plaintiff’s deliberate and egregious misconduct makes any sanction other than dismissal inadequate to ensure a fair trial, the trial court has inherent power to impose a terminating sanction.

In 1991, plaintiff Stephen Slesinger, Inc. (SSI), sued defendant the Walt Disney Company (Disney), alleging that Disney failed to pay certain royalties under its licensing agreement with SSI. That agreement granted Disney rights to exploit the Winnie the Pooh series of children’s stories—rights that SSI’s…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. The United States v. Hudson and GoodwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1812
  2. Michele E. Shepherd and Larue Graves v. American Broadcasting Companies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
  3. Salim Aoude v. Mobil Oil CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
  4. Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v. Natural Beverage Distributors, D/B/A Mendocino Coast Distributing Co. Florence M. BeardsleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. United Grand Corp. v. Malibu Hillbillies, LLC, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  2. Prime Mortgage USA, Inc. v. NicholsIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. Quantification Settlement Agreement CasesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  4. Clark v. Optical Coating Laboratory, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2008
  5. New Albertsons, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API