Legal Opinion
Orcilla v. Big Sur, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 11, 2016No. H040021PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PREMO, J.
Plaintiffs Virgilio and Teodora Orcilla lost their San Jose home (the Property) through a nonjudicial foreclosure sale in May 2010. The Property was purchased by a third party, defendant Big Sur, Inc. (Big Sur). The Orcillas vacated the Property after Big Sur obtained a judgment against them in an unlawful detainer action. Thereafter, the Orcillas sued Big Sur and the parties involved in the nonjudicial foreclosure sale, Bank of America, N.A. (BofA); ReconTrust Company, N.A. (ReconTrust); and Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. (MERS) (collectively, the Bank…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Armendariz v. Found. Health Psychcare Servs., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
- Kwikset Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
- Careau & Co. v. Security Pacific Business Credit, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1990
- Pinnacle Museum Tower Ass'n v. Pinnacle Market Development (US), LLCCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Dr. Leevil, LLC v. Westlake Health Care CenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
- Esparza v. Sand & Sea, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2016
- Kahan v. City of Richmond, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Dr. Leevil, LLC v. Westlake Health Care CenterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- Chu v. Fay Servicing, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2020
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.