Legal Opinion
Dr. Leevil, LLC v. Westlake Health Care Center
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 7, 2017No. 2d Civil B266931PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTangeman, J.
*452 A purchaser at a foreclosure sale seeks to evict the occupant of the property as soon as possible. It serves a notice to quit after the sale but before recording title to the property. Here we reject the occupant's claim that the notice to quit is premature, and hold that Code of Civil Procedure section 1161a 1 does not require that title be recorded before the notice to quit is served. We affirm.
BACKGROUND
Jeoung Hie Lee and Il Hie Lee own Westlake Village Property, L.P. (Westlake Village), a business entity that formerly owned a skilled nursing facility. In 2002, Westlake Village leased the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- City of Hope National Medical Center v. Genentech, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2008
- Garfinkle v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Schabarum v. California LegislatureCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Principal Mutual Life Insurance v. Vars, Pave, McCord & FreedmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Bevill v. ZouraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Dr. Leevil, LLC v. Westlake Health Care CenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
- Dr. Leevil v. Westlake Health Care Center CA2/6California Court of Appeal · 2021