Nemie v. Todd
Supreme Court of Vermont
Trover. Pleas, the general issue, that the goods were the property of plaintiff’s husband, and justification under process against him. Trial by jury at the September Term, 1914, Chittenden County, Butler, J., presiding. Verdict and judgment for the plaintiff. • The defendant excepted. The bill of exceptions referred to the transcript and made it controlling.
1Opinion of the CourtMunson, C. J.
The action is trover for property taken and sold by the defendant on an execution against the plaintiff’s husband. The plaintiff claims the chattels as her separate property, and sues in her own name, without other designation or description. She testified that she was doing business as the Vermont Produce Company, with her own money. The return made under No. 117, Acts of 1908, gives the name as the Vermont Products Company, and was not filed within the time required by the act, nor until after the property was taken in execution.
The statute requires a return setting forth the name under…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Paulsen v. ManskeIllinois Supreme Court · 1888
- Willard v. Town of NewburySupreme Court of Vermont · 1850
- Lycoming Fire Insurance v. Medad Wright & SonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1883
- Wills v. BarristerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1863
- Bugbee v. Stevens & BagleySupreme Court of Vermont · 1881
3Cited by6 opinions
- Rogers v. WhitneySupreme Court of Vermont · 1917
- Peryer v. PennockSupreme Court of Vermont · 1921
- Stoddard & Son v. Village of North TroySupreme Court of Vermont · 1930
- Enosburg Grain Co. v. Wilder ClarkSupreme Court of Vermont · 1941
- Wheelock v. HaskellSupreme Court of Vermont · 1924
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.