Legal Opinion

Wheelock v. Haskell

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided May 29, 1924PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButler, J.

The complaint is in the name of I. Glee Wheelock and Flora Brown as individuals. The plaintiffs seek to recover of the defendants, as directors of the Woodbury Cooperative Creamery Company, Inc., under the statute G. L. 4931, a debt due them from the creamery company, on the ground that the defendants have never complied with the statute by filing a copy of the certificate of capital paid in. The writ is dated January 12, 1921. So far as appears by the record, the case stands on general denial.

The Woodbury Co-operative Creamery Company was a corporation organized under the General Laws.

G. L.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Huntington v. AttrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Wellman v. MeadSupreme Court of Vermont · 1919
  3. Osgood v. Central Vermont Railway Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1905
  4. Town of Ryegate v. Town of WardsboroSupreme Court of Vermont · 1858
  5. President of the Manhattan Co. v. KaldenbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1900

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Brammall v. LaroseSupreme Court of Vermont · 1933
  2. True's Oil Co. v. KeeneyWashington Supreme Court · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API