Legal Opinion
Enosburg Grain Co. v. Wilder Clark
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided May 13, 1941PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMoulton, C. J.
This cause was tried by jury in the Franklin Municipal Court. The plaintiffs are co-partners, and the three defendants Allen Wilder, Ross Clark and Eunice Clark were sought to be held liable as co-partners for a sum claimed to be due for grain and feed previously sold and delivered. The verdict was for the plaintiff against all three defendants.
After verdict and before judgment the defendants moved to dismiss the action because there had been no evidence that, prior to the issuance of the writ, the plaintiff had complied with the provisions of Chapter 247 of the Public Laws by filing a return…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Tyrrell v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Vermont · 1937
- Applegate v. Lexington & Carter County Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Leonard v. WillcoxSupreme Court of Vermont · 1928
- Howe v. Lisbon Savings Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1940
- Paska v. SaundersSupreme Court of Vermont · 1931
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Town of Brighton v. Town of CharlestonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1945
- Benoit v. MarvinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1958
- Senesac v. DuclosSupreme Court of Vermont · 1970
- Woodmansee v. SmithSupreme Court of Vermont · 1971
- Michael Rinaldo v. Bennington Self StorageSupreme Court of Vermont · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.