International Artware Corp. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Wilson, Judge:
Twelve protests were consolidated for the purposes of trial at the port of Cleveland, Ohio where the imported merchandise was entered. Counsel agreed that there are four specific items before the court and that plaintiff’s exhibits 1 to 4 inclusive are representative of them. They are as follows:
*145Invoice Description Exhibit No. Item No.
Poly. Mistletoe Hanging Balls__ FL 1177 H
Poly. Small Mistletoe Balls_ FL 2013 to
Poly. Hanging Holly Balls_ FL 1446 W
Crescent Mistletoe Arrangement FL 2749 ^
The merchandise was classified as “Christmas tree ornaments” under the Tariff Schedules of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Border Brokerage Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
- A. N. Deringer, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962
- Diamond Trading Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
- Voss Int. Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968