Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. Young
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Madison Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Howard, J
The appellant’s railroad extends along its right of way through the lands of appellees, crossing Lilly creek, a natural stream of water, on trestle work about thirty feet high and three hundred and twenty feet long.
Appellant being about to fill up this trestle work with earth, except a space to be occupied by a stone arch or culvert w-ith an opening twelve feet wide and ten feet and five inches high in the arch, appellees brought suit to enjoin the work, claiming that the arch would be insufficient for the passage of the waters of Lilly creek, and that great, continuous, and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Cox v. Louisville, New Albany, & Chicago RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
- Mohawk Bridge Co. v. Utica & Schenectady Rail RoadNew York Court of Chancery · 1837
- Owen v. PhillipsIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Clark v. Jeffersonville RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
- Sherlock v. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1888
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- New York, Chicago & St. Louis Railroad v. Hamlet Hay Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1897
- Viestenz v. Arthur TownshipNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1952
- Cincinnati, Bluffton & Chicago Railroad v. WallIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
- Harris v. KreklerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1943
- Drake v. SchoenstedtIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.