Legal Opinion

Drake v. Schoenstedt

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1897No. 18,349PublishedCited by 6 opinions

From the Adams Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHoward, C. J.

This was a suit by appellant to restrain appellee from draining into a tile ditch, to the injury of appellant’s land, certain waters which otherwise would flow in a different direction.

The facts as found by the court show: That appellant owns thirty acres of land lying immediately south of and below a forty-acre tract owned by appellee; that, in 1888, the board of county commissioners constructed a six-inch tile drain, beginning in appellee’s said tract and eight rods north of the line dividing his land from appellant’s, thence south through said eight rods of appellee’s land and through…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lipes v. HandIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Denton v. ThompsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  3. McAllister v. HendersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. YoungIndiana Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Williams v. OsborneIndiana Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Maxwell v. ShirtsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1901
  3. Meyer v. PlotnerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1916
  4. Morris v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Schleman v. LeekaIndiana Court of Appeals · 1921

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API