In re Locher
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Rioi-t, Judge.
This appeal is from the decision of the Patent Office Board of Appeals affirming the rejection of claims 1-12 in appellant’s application serial No. 399,783, filed September 28,1964, for feedback quality control mechanisms and methods. We affirm.
The Subject Matter Claimed
The claimed invention regulates the operation of quality control equipment to produce a desired number of control actions per unit of time. The purpose of this regulation is to insure maximum utilization of available, on-line, quality-control equipment and operators. This purpose is accomplished by a feedback…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Application of Newsome W. GayCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962
- Application of Rudolf WiechertCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967
- Application of William G. Baird, Jr., Carl A. Lindstrom, Jr., Arthur L. Besse, Jr., and Donald J. D'EntrEmontCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
- Palisades Pageants, Inc. v. Miss America PageantCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
- Application of Sabatino R. Orfeo and Kevin P. MurphyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Knickerbocker Toy Co. v. Faultless Starch Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
- Tiffany & Co. v. National Gypsum Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
- In re GunnCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1976
- Holiday Inc. v. Holiday MagicCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
- Pomet v. Allstate Property and Casualty Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2022