Legal Opinion

Application of William G. Baird, Jr., Carl A. Lindstrom, Jr., Arthur L. Besse, Jr., and Donald J. D'EntrEmont

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided August 20, 1965No. Patent Appeal 7445PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RICH, Judge.

This appeal is from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the Patent Office in application serial No. 817,246, filed June 1, 1959, by Baird, Jr., Lindstrom, Jr., Besse, Jr., and D’Entremont for “Method of Treating Polypropylene.”

The application at bar is stated to be a continuation-in-part of application serial No. 713,848, filed February 7,1958, by the same four inventors for “Method of Producing Film Having Improved Shrink Energy,” now patent No. 3,022,-543, herein “Baird et al.,” issued to W. R. Grace & Co., assignee, on February 27, 1962.

The Issues

This appeal presents three…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Application of Christian Zickendraht and Arthur BuehlerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
  2. In Re DraegerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1945
  3. In re RuffCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1958
  4. In re GruschwitzCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
  5. In the Matter of the Application of Sylvan O. GreenleeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1955

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. In re WertheimCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1976
  2. Application of Virgil W. Vogel and Paul W. VogelCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
  3. Application of Rudolf WiechertCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967
  4. Application of John D. Sutherland, JrCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
  5. Application of Edgar G. HeylCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API