Legal Opinion

Makoviney v. Svinth

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided August 7, 1978No. 2877-2PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Soule, J. —

The plaintiffs brought an action against defendants for personal injuries sustained by the plaintiff, John Makoviney, while on the premises of the Montesano Equipment Company, which is owned by the defendants Svinth. The case was tried to the court without a jury. By agreement of counsel, the liability portion of the case was separated from that relating to damages. At the end of all the evidence pertaining to liability, judgment was rendered for the defendants. We affirm the judgment.

For ease of reference, the injured plaintiff, John Mako-viney, will hereafter be referred to as if…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Beck v. DyeWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Zukowsky v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Northern State Construction Co. v. BancheroWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Brewer v. CopelandWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Weber v. BiddleWashington Supreme Court · 1967

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Beckenstein v. Potter & Carrier, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  2. State v. PicardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998
  3. Deep Water Brewing v. Fairway Resources Ltd.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  4. Deep Water Brewing, LLC v. Fairway Resources Ltd.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  5. Topline Equipment, Inc. v. Stan Witty Land, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API