Legal Opinion
Rueckel v. Texas Eastern Transmission Corp.
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided December 7, 1981No. 16-CA-81 and 18-CA-81PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHenderson, P. J.
Case No. 16-CA-81 is an appeal from a summary judgment of the Court of Common Pleas of Fairfield County granting judgment to defendants-appellants, Texas Eastern Transmission Corporation (Texas Eastern) and Allegheny Pipeline Company (Allegheny), by determining that the pine trees planted on the rights-of-way of the defendants obstruct, burden and interfere with the exercise of their easement rights, and finding that defendants are entitled to remove the pine trees on their rights-of-way and that plaintiffs-appellees, Emil Robert Rueckel and Agnes Rowena Rueckel, are prohibited from…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Langhorst v. RiethmillerOhio Court of Appeals · 1977
- Buckeye Pipe Line Company v. Edward M. Keating and Mercantile National Bank of Hammond, as Trustee, and the Town of Highland, Lake County, IndianaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1956
- Babler v. Shell Pipe Line CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1940
- Tenneco, Inc. v. MayDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1974
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Andrews v. Columbia Gas Transmission Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Crane Hollow, Inc. v. Marathon Ashland Pipe Line, LLCOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
- Columbia Gas Transmission Corp. v. BennettOhio Court of Appeals · 1990
- Mid-America Pipeline Co. v. WietharnSupreme Court of Kansas · 1990
- Swango Homes, Inc. v. Columbia Gas Transmission Corp.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1992
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.