Legal Opinion

Buckeye Pipe Line Company v. Edward M. Keating and Mercantile National Bank of Hammond, as Trustee, and the Town of Highland, Lake County, Indiana

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided March 13, 1956No. 11565PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SWAIM, Circuit Judge.

This case involves a type of conflict that is often occurring throughout the United States. A pipe line, used for transporting crude oil, has been located and operated pursuant to an easement since 1888. In 1952 urban growth led to the subdivision of the land through which the pipe ran and the construction of houses, streets and all the requirements of a city residential area. Four of the streets of the subdivision cross the pipe line, and the foundation of the pavement of at least one of these would extend about two inches below the top of the pipe. The plaintiff claims…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Thomas v. LauerIndiana Supreme Court · 1949

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Reed v. LuznyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. Rueckel v. Texas Eastern Transmission Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Magnolia Pipe Line Company v. City of TylerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961
  4. Texon, Inc. v. Holyoke MacHine Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
  5. Holding v. Indiana & Michigan Electric Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1980

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API