Legal Opinion
Tenneco, Inc. v. May
District Court, E.D. Kentucky
Decided June 24, 1974No. 2300PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
SWINFORD, District Judge.
On May 6, 1957-, the plaintiff was granted an easement for an underground pipeline across the defendants’ property. The pipeline was duly installed and maintained without interference with the servient estate. Early in 1971, the defendants commenced construction of a paved roadway over portions of the Tenneco easement. This action for injunctive relief and damages was initiated following the plaintiff’s determination that the contemplated road and vehicle traffic would place excessive stress on the pipeline. An agreed order entered October 26, 1971,…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Dieter Hulsenbusch v. The Davidson Rubber Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965
- Potter v. Northern Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1968
- Central Kentucky Natural Gas Co. v. HulsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1951
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Columbia Gas Transmission, Corporation v. Limited CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- Bedell v. H.R.C. Ltd.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1981
- Rueckel v. Texas Eastern Transmission Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1981
- Texon, Inc. v. Holyoke MacHine Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
- McCann v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.