Legal Opinion

Mid-America Pipeline Co. v. Wietharn

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 2, 1990No. 63,064PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Allegrucci, J.:

Petitioner, Mid-America Pipeline Company (Mid-America), brought this action seeking a mandatory injunction ordering appellees to remove four buildings constructed over petitioner’s pipeline easement and a preventive injunction prohibiting further construction. The trial court found that appellees violated the easement and ordered construction be halted but, instead of ordering the buildings removed, ordered that the pipelines be relocated with petitioner paying the majority of the costs. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Rex v. WarnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958
  2. Hoffman v. HaugSupreme Court of Kansas · 1988
  3. Warsaw v. Chicago Metallic Ceilings, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Bach v. SarichWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Papanikolas Bros. Enterprises v. Sugarhouse Shopping Center AssociatesUtah Supreme Court · 1975

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Nelson v. NelsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  2. Mid-America Pipeline Co. v. Lario Enters., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  3. Empire Manufacturing Co. v. Empire Candle, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2002
  4. Nat'l Compressed Steel Corp. v. Unified Gov't of Wyandotte County/Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 2002
  5. Brown v. CONOCOPHILLIPS PIPELINE CO.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2012

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API