Legal Opinion

Columbia Gas Transmission Corp. v. Bennett

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 17, 1990No. 12039PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrady, J.

DefendantsAppellants Robert M. Bennett, et al., appeal the trial court's decision finding that the Bennetts' title to real property was encumbered by an easement for a high pressure natural gas transmission line owned and operated by Plaintiff-Appellee Columbia Gas Transmission Corp., and permanently enjoining the Bennetts from building a structure within the easement boundaries. The trial courtfound that, notwithstanding an erroneous Section designation in the instrument granting Columbia Gas an easement through their property, the Bennetts had constructive notice of the encumbrance.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Seasons Coal Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  3. C. E. Morris Co. v. Foley Construction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
  4. In Re Estate of FahleOhio Court of Appeals · 1950
  5. Wayne Building & Loan Co. v. YarboroughOhio Supreme Court · 1967

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Andrews v. Columbia Gas Transmission Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  2. Crane Hollow, Inc. v. Marathon Ashland Pipe Line, LLCOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. Murray v. LyonOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. TishnerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. Snyder v. Monroe Township TrusteesOhio Court of Appeals · 1996

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API