Legal Opinion
In Re Ferrero Litigation
District Court, S.D. California
Decided June 30, 2011No. 3:11-cr-00205PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS
MARILYN L. HUFF, District Judge.
On April 18, 2011, Defendant Ferrero U.S.A., Inc. (“Ferrero”) filed a motion to dismiss Plaintiffs’ consolidated complaint. (Doc. Nos. 30-31.) On May 31, 2011, Plaintiffs filed a response in opposition to Defendant’s motion to dismiss. (Doc. No. 39.) On June 13, 2011, Defendant filed a reply in support of its motion. (Doc. No. 42.) The Court determined this matter to be appropriate for resolution without oral argument and submitted it on the parties’ papers pursuant to Local Civil Rule 7.1(d)(1). (Doc.…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Gibbons v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Navarro v. BlockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Hadley v. Kellogg Sales Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2017
- Hughes v. Ester C Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 2013
- Anderson v. Jamba Juice Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2012
- Krommenhock v. Post Foods, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2017
- In re Onstar Contract LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2011
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.