Legal Opinion

Berg v. Standard Light Co. of Cal.

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 29, 1928No. Docket No. 6188PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTyler, P. J.

Action to recover for work and labor performed. The complaint alleges in substance that defendants employed plaintiff, together with others named F. McNeil, Joseph Beechler, Wm. H. Brockett, and Wilfred Brockett, respectively, to work and labor for defendant Standard Light Company at certain agreed wages per week. The company was not in a prosperous condition and it was unable to pay said persons their wages in full at the close of each week. Partial payments were made, but the com pany kept getting farther and farther behind in the payment of the workmen until June, 1922-, when the company…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. California Savings & Loan Society v. HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. First Natl. Bank of San Luis Obispo v. HendersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Rudneck v. Southern California Metal & Rubber Co.California Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Ward Land & Stock Co. v. MapesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Phillips v. GoldtreeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lande v. JurisichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  2. Fitch v. Pacific Fidelity Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  3. Reynolds v. ReynoldsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  4. Mathewson v. AldermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API