Reynolds v. Reynolds
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
MUNDO, J., pro tem.
This is an appeal by the plaintiff wife in a divorce action, wherein the respondent was joined as claiming part of the community property.
James Reynolds, a married man, was appointed referee in a condemnation suit. His fee for such services was allowed in the sum of $1560. Upon an action for divorce being filed by his wife, and before he had completed his work as referee, Reynolds assigned his fee to the respondent Lottie V. Weathers for $400 cash and the cancellation of a note for $100. His wife did not consent to the assignment. As between Reynolds and his wife the court…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Matter of StrykerNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
- Kirkwood v. SotoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Crawford v. BradfordSupreme Court of Florida · 1887
- Martin v. County of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Berg v. Standard Light Co. of Cal.California Court of Appeal · 1928
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Earhart v. FrohmillerArizona Supreme Court · 1947
- Otten v. University HospitalsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
- Lande v. JurisichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Fitch v. Pacific Fidelity Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- United States v. GerdelDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1952
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.