Legal Opinion
Lande v. Jurisich
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 9, 1943No. Civ. 13607PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SHAW, J. pro tem.
Plaintiff appeals from the judgment in an action for declaratory relief. He sought a declaration that a specific part of a contract set up in his complaint is invalid and therefore not binding upon him; the trial court declared it to be valid. The facts are not in dispute. The answer admitted all of the complaint except some conclusions of law, the parties stipulated to the facts so admitted and the court made findings accordingly.
The material facts are as follows. On October 15, 1940, the plaintiff, to evidence a loan to him of $1,000 by defendant, made his promissory note…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Calhoun v. MassieSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Nutt v. KnutSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Boyce v. FiskCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Estate of BeffaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Rosenberg v. LawrenceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Wal-Noon Corp. v. HillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Stein v. SimpsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- California State Restaurant Assn. v. WhitlowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Thompson v. 10,000 RV Sales, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2005
- Buchwald v. Superior Court of S.F.California Court of Appeal · 1967
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.