Legal Opinion
Ashley Furniture Industries, Inc. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided August 19, 2013No. Nos. 2012-1196, 2012-1200PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MOORE, Circuit Judge.
Ashley Furniture, Inc., Ethan Allen Global, Inc., and Ethan Allen Operations, Inc. (Appellants) appeal from the decisions of the Court of International Trade (CIT) dismissing Appellants’ complaints seeking compensation pursuant to the Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act (the Byrd Amendment) for failure to state a claim for relief. Because the CIT correctly concluded that Appellants are not Affected Domestic Producers (ADPs) within the meaning of the Byrd Amendment and thus do not qualify for the requested relief, we affirm,.
BACKGROUND
Appellants are domestic producers…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Sioux Honey Ass'n v. Hartford Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- SKF USA, Inc. v. United States Customs & Border ProtectionCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- United States Shoe Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- PS Chez Sidney, L.L.C. v. United States International Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Ethan Allen Global, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- International Custom Products, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- Gpx International Tire Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- Schaeffler Group USA, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- Pat Huval Restaurant & Oyster Bar, Inc. v. International Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- Giorgio Foods, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.