Legal Opinion

SKF USA, Inc. v. United States Customs & Border Protection

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided February 19, 2009No. 2008-1005, 2008-1006, 2008-1007, 2008-1008PublishedCited by 83 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge DYK. Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge LINN.

*1340DYK, Circuit Judge.

The Continued Dumping and Subsidy-Offset Act of 2000 (the “Byrd Amendment”) provides for the distribution of an-tidumping duties collected by the United States to eligible “affected domestic producers” of the dumped goods. 19 U.S.C. § 1675e(a) (2000). An “affected domestic producer” must be “a petitioner or interested party in support of the petition with respect to which an antidumping duty order ... has been entered.” Id. § 1675c(b)(l)(A).

In 2005 the United States…

2Cases cited62 opinions

  1. Zadvydas v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Gibbons v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1824

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by83 opinions

  1. Ningbo Dafa Chemical Fiber Co., Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
  2. Jodelle Kirk v. Schaeffler Group USACourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018
  3. Abbott Laboratories v. Cordis CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
  4. Resource Investments, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
  5. PS Chez Sidney, L.L.C. v. United States International Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012

78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API