Legal Opinion

Helm v. State of Wyoming

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 2000No. 99-21, 99-22, 99-23PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEHMAN, Chief Justice.

James Bryan Helm (Helm) appeals from his convictions for forgery and obtaining property by false pretenses. He claims he was denied his constitutional rights to due process and a fair trial because the trial court refused to order production of exeulpa-tory evidence, the prosecutor committed mis conduct, and the court induced him to plead guilty by misrepresenting its sentencing authority. Finding no judicial error or prose-cutorial misconduct, we affirm.

ISSUES

Helm presents this statement of the issues:

I. Did the court deprive Appellant of his constitutional rights to…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Vigil v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Dice v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Armstrong v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1992

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Gleason v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Lancaster v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Burton v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State v. OrtizSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
  5. Doherty v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2006

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API