Legal Opinion

CHURCHILL ENVIR. PARTNERS v. Ernst & Young

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided April 30, 2002No. C7-01-1905Published

1Opinion of the Court

643 N.W.2d 333 (2002)

CHURCHILL ENVIRONMENTAL AND INDUSTRIAL EQUITY PARTNERS, L.P., et al., Respondents,

v.

ERNST & YOUNG, L.L.P., Appellant.

No. C7-01-1905.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

April 30, 2002.

James P. McCarthy, Terrence J. Fleming, Michael Olafson, Lindquist & Vennum, PLLP, Minneapolis, MN, for respondents.

Timothy D. Kelly, Jennifer L. Frisch, Kelly & Berens, P.A., Minneapolis, MN; and Jonathan C. Medow, Brian J. Massengill, Jeffrey W. Sarles, Mayer, Brown, Rowe & Maw, Chicago, IL, for appellant.

Considered and decided by SHUMAKER, Presiding Judge, FOLEY, Judge, and HUSPENI, Judge.[*]

OPIN…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Southland Corp. v. KeatingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. In the Matter of the Arbitration Between Prudential Lines, Inc., and Exxon CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API