Legal Opinion

Danielson v. Castle Meadows, Inc.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 23, 1990No. 89SA64PublishedCited by 83 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Erickson

This is an appeal from the order of the water court for Water Division No. 1 that approved, subject to several provisions for retained jurisdiction, the plan for augmentation of not nontributary Denver aquifer ground water1 proposed by applicant-ap-pellee Castle Meadows, Inc.2. Castle Meadows had previously obtained, for use as a municipal water supply, a decree for a water right to not nontributary Denver aquifer ground water that was not within a designated ground water basin. See § 37-90-137(4), 15 C.R.S. (1989 Supp.). The augmentation plan provides for replacement of four percent of the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ingram v. CooperSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
  2. Griffin v. SW Devanney & Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1989
  3. Fellhauer v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1968
  4. State v. Southwestern Colorado Water Conservation DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
  5. Lucero v. Climax Molybdenum Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1987

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by83 opinions

  1. Jefferson County Board of Equalization v. GerganoffSupreme Court of Colorado · 2010
  2. Dunlap v. Colorado Springs Cablevision, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  3. State Engineer v. Castle Meadows, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  4. Cooley v. Big Horn Harvestore Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  5. May Department Stores Co. v. State Ex Rel. WoodardSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993

78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API