Legal Opinion
Ingram v. Cooper
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided January 21, 1985No. 82SA437, 83SA56, 83SA57, 83SA308, 83SA326 and 84SA29PublishedCited by 87 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ERICKSON, Chief Justice.
In this consolidated appeal, the petitioners are inmates at the Colorado State Penitentiary who claim they were improperly denied good-time credits under sections 17-20-104 and 17-20-105, 8 C.R.S. (1978). The petitioners assert that they are entitled to a cumulative award of good-time credits under sections 17-20-104, 17-20-105, and 17-20-107, but received actual credit only under section 17-20-107. We conclude that the district court properly interpreted Colorado statutes regarding credit reductions against the sentences imposed by allowing the petitioners good-time…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Travelers Indemnity Company v. BarnesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1976
- Frohlick Crane Service, Inc. v. MacKSupreme Court of Colorado · 1973
- Stephen v. City and County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
- Colorado & Southern Railway Co. v. District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1972
- Dye Const. Co. v. DolanColorado Court of Appeals · 1978
3Cited by87 opinions
- State v. NietoSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
- Bickel v. City of BoulderSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
- Danielson v. Castle Meadows, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1990
- Colorado Common Cause v. MeyerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
- Colorado Health Care Ass'n v. Colorado Department of Social ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.