Legal Opinion

State Engineer v. Castle Meadows, Inc.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided July 12, 1993No. 92SA163, 92SA164PublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lohr

In these consolidated cases,1 the State Engineer and the Division Engineer for Water Division No. 1 (collectively, state engineer) appeal those portions of judgments of the District Court for Water Division No. 1 approving plans for augmentation proposed by the applicants in each case.2 In Case Number 92SA163 the district court held an evidentiary hearing pursuant to our order of remand in Danielson v. Castle Meadows, Inc., 791 P.2d 1106 (1990) (Castle Meadows I), to determine whether the pumping of not nontributary groundwater from the Denver aquifer by Castle Meadows, Inc. will result in…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Woodsmall v. Regional Transportation DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
  2. Dunlap v. Colorado Springs Cablevision, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  3. Danielson v. Castle Meadows, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1990
  4. Weibert v. Rothe Bros., Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1980
  5. Fellhauer v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1968

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. City of Thornton v. Bijou Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  2. People v. BaerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
  3. City of Aurora v. Colorado State EngineerSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
  4. Board of County Commissioners v. Bainbridge, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  5. Pueblo Bancorporation v. Lindoe, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2003

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API