Torrez v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CONTRERAS, Presiding Judge.
This appeal concerns the validity of an exclusion endorsement in an insurance policy issued by appellee to a third party. We find that the exclusion endorsement is valid and therefore affirm the summary judgment granted appellee by the trial court,
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
The uncontroverted facts before the trial court are as follows. Prior to 1975, Mr. and Mrs. DeBreceny’s 1966 Rambler was insured by appellee. In February 1975, their son, Brian, was added to the policy as principal driver of the Rambler. In May 1975, an agent of appellee discovered that Brian had…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Fuller Brush Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1940
- Coyner Crop Dusters v. MarshArizona Supreme Court · 1962
- Frye v. South Phoenix Volunteer Fire Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1950
- Crook v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
- Coyner Crop Dusters v. MarshArizona Supreme Court · 1962
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Texas Ass'n of Business v. Texas Air Control BoardTexas Supreme Court · 1993
- Jordan C. v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
- Ruesga v. Kindred Nursing Centers West, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- Pierce v. Oklahoma Property & Casualty Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- State Farm Automobile Insurance v. DresslerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.