Legal Opinion

Coyner Crop Dusters v. Marsh

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1962No. 6543PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JENNINGS, Justice.

In a consolidated action for wrongful death and destruction of an airplane, plaintiffs appeal from a verdict and judgment for defendants. Parties will be designated as in the trial court. Plaintiffs are Elizabeth Coyner, wife of decedent, executrix, and Coyner Crop Dusters, a corporation. Defendants are W. O. Marsh et al., a partnership, Carl Nicholson, Paradise Airport, a corporation, and Leonard Pemberton.

The death and destruction was caused by a ground collision of two crop duster planes on the ‘duster strip’ at Paradise Airport situated northwest of Phoenix, Arizona.…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Smith v. Kansas City Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1931
  2. Butane Corporation v. KirbyArizona Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Alabam Freight Lines v. Phoenix Bakery, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Odekirk v. AustinArizona Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Barry v. Southern Pac. Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1946

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Rancho Pescado, Inc. v. Northwestern Mutual Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
  2. Ramsey Air Meds, L.L.C. v. Cutter Aviation, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
  3. Coury Bros. Ranches, Inc. v. EllsworthArizona Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Nichols v. BakerArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Fleitz v. Van WestrienenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API