Legal Opinion
Arthur v. Nyquist
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided July 22, 1983No. 1037, Docket 82-7690PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NEWMAN, Circuit Judge:
This appeal and a companion matter decided this day, No. 82-7802, concern the propriety of remedies ordered by the District Court for the Western District of New York (John T. Curtin, Chief Judge) as part of continuing efforts to eliminate the deliberate racial segregation previously found to have existed in the public school system of Buffalo, New York. In this appeal the Mayor and the Common Council of Buffalo *811(the “City defendants”) appeal from Chief Judge Curtin’s August 27, 1982, order requiring the City defendants to provide the Buffalo Board of Education…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Youngberg v. Romeo Ex Rel. RomeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Milliken v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- George Arthur v. Ewald P. NyquistCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- Arthur v. NyquistDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1976
- George Arthur v. Ewald P. Nyquist, and Community Advisory Board for Bilingual Education of Buffalo, Etc., Intervenors-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Liddell v. MissouriCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
- Craton Liddell v. State of Missouri, Craton Liddell v. City of St. Louis, Plaintiff-Intervenor/appellant. In Re City of St. Louis, Paul Berra and Ronald A. LeggettCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Board of Educ. of City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1984
- United States v. City Of YonkersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- Fisher v. Tucson Unified School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.