Legal Opinion
United States v. Board of Educ. of City of Chicago
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided July 17, 1984No. 80 C 5124PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SHADUR, District Judge.
[[Image here]]
[[Image here]]
This case has tended to be sidetracked by a “false conflict” 1 created by the United States: By creating an artificial limitation on funds otherwise available or potentially available to satisfy the extensive Desegregation Plan needs of Chicago’s Board of Education (let alone the varying needs of other claimants of funds), the United States has sought to place the Board (and this Court) into a position as though the Board (and this Court) were choking off deserving educational programs. 2 That is simply not true. It is the United States…
2Cases cited104 opinions
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Powell v. McCormackSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
99 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Haberman v. Washington Public Power Supply SystemWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- Messenger v. MessengerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
- Georgia Association of Retarded Citizens v. Dr. Charles McDaniel in His Official Capacity as State Superintendent of SchoolsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
- Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. HenneyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2000
- Burger King Corp. v. MajeedDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1992
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.