Legal Opinion
Liddell v. Missouri
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided February 8, 1984No. Nos. 83-1957, 83-2033, 83-2118, 83-2140, 83-2220, and 83-2554PublishedCited by 76 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT EN BANC, Lay, Chief Judge, Heaney, Bright, Ross, McMillian, Arnold and Fagg, Circuit Judges, with John R. Gibson, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part, Bowman, Circuit Judge, dissenting.
The Caldwell and Liddell plaintiffs, representing black students and parents of the St. Louis City School District, the City School District, and several suburban school districts have entered into a unique and comprehensive settlement agreement designed to further desegregation in the city schools. The United States District Court has approved the agreement and has…
2Cases cited74 opinions
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Brown v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by76 opinions
- Hibbs v. WinnSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Missouri v. JenkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- In re Domestic Air Transportation Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1993
- Craton Liddell v. State of Missouri, Craton Liddell v. City of St. Louis, Plaintiff-Intervenor/appellant. In Re City of St. Louis, Paul Berra and Ronald A. LeggettCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
- Little Earth Of The United Tribes, Inc. v. United States Department Of Housing And Urban DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.