Legal Opinion

Jackson v. Mountain Sanitarium & Asheville Agr. Sch.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 10, 1951No. 96PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBauNhill, J.

The record fails to disclose any evidence of sufficient probative force to require the submission of issues as against the corporate defendant. Hence the judgment of nonsuit as to it must be affirmed. Wilson v. Hospital, 232 N.C. 362, 61 S.E. 2d 102, and cases cited. See Anno. 60 A.L.R. 147.

Tbe judgment of nonsuit as to tbe defendant Hanson is sustained on authority of Byrd v. Hospital, 202 N.C. 337, 162 S.E. 738. What is there said is controlling here.

However, different questions are presented on plaintiff’s appeal from the judgment on the verdict as to the defendant Joyner.

Dr. Peasley…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Nash v. . RoysterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  2. Pendergraft v. RoysterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  3. Pendergraft v. . RoysterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  4. Byrd v. Marion General HospitalSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  5. Mitchell v. . SaundersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Hunt v. BradshawSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  2. Watkins v. North Carolina State Board of Dental ExaminersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
  3. Mazza v. HuffakerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  4. Galloway Ex Rel. Parks v. LawrenceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  5. Harris v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API