Legal Opinion · Dissent

Pendergraft v. . Royster

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 26, 1932PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1DissentConnor, J.

This was a civil action for actionable negligence, instituted by plaintiff against defendant, in which she alleges damages. The plaintiff contends, and it is admitted by the defendant, that in January, 1929, she submitted herself to Dr. W. B. Dewar, of Raleigh, North Carolina, for a thorough examination and that plaintiff consulted the defendant and after an examination by the defendant that the defendant advised an operation and that defendant operated upon plaintiff at Rex Hospital in the city of Raleigh.

The plaintiff testified, in part: "We have one little girl who is five years old; after…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Speas v. Merchants Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  2. Springs v. . DollSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  3. Womble v. . Grocery Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  4. Evans v. RobertsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1915
  5. Slimak v. FosterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Shearin v. LloydSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  2. Whetstine v. MoravecSupreme Court of Iowa · 1940
  3. Frost v. Des Moines Still College of Osteopathy & SurgerySupreme Court of Iowa · 1956
  4. Voss Ex Rel. Voss v. BridwellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1961
  5. Fehrman v. SmirlWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API