Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Mitchell v. . Saunders

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 26, 1941PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1ConcurrenceStacy, C. J.

BARNHILL and WINBORNE, JJ., join in concurring opinion. This cause comes here upon an appeal of the defendants, John T. Saunders and Julian A. Moore, from a judgment of Nettles, J., rendered in the Superior Court of Buncombe County, affirming the judgment of the general county court of Buncombe County, where recovery had been made against the defendants for injuries which the plaintiff alleges she sustained through the negligence of the defendants in leaving a gauze sponge deeply buried in the side of her leg or hip, about one-half inch from the thigh bone, where it had been placed during an…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Sweeney v. ErvingSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Gannon v. Laclede Gas Light Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1898
  3. Lindenbaum v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
  4. Stewart v. Carpet Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  5. White Ex Rel. White v. HinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Shearin v. LloydSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  2. Walker v. DistlerIdaho Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Jackson v. Mountain Sanitarium & Asheville Agr. Sch.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  4. Little v. MatthewsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  5. Young v. Anchor Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1954

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API