Legal Opinion

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Thomas

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 10, 2009No. Misc. Docket AG No. 6, September Term, 2008PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARRELL, Judge.

The Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland (“Petitioner”), acting through Bar Counsel, filed a Petition for Disciplinary or Remedial Action against David Moore Thomas (“Respondent” or “Thomas”) charging him with numerous violations stemming largely from Respondent’s handling of his trust account. Petitioner charged Respondent with violation of Maryland Lawyers’ Rules of Professional Conduct (“MRPC”) 1.15 1 (Safekeeping Property) and 8.4(a-d) 2 (Mis conduct), Md.Code (2004 RepLVol. & 2008 Supp.), Business Occupations & Professions Art. §§ 10-304, 3 10-306, 4 and 10-307, 5 and…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. VanderlindeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GlennCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. AwuahCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. ZuckermanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  5. ATTORNEY GRIEV. COM'N OF MARYLAND v. MyersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. HodesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. LaraCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. PalmerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. EdibCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. NwadikeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API