Legal Opinion
In Re Trusteeship Under Agreement With Mayo
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided November 10, 1960No. 37,943, 37,944PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
259 Minn. 91 (1960)
105 N.W. (2d) 900
IN RE TRUSTEESHIP UNDER AGREEMENT WITH CHARLES H. MAYO.
ESTHER MAYO HARTZELL AND OTHERS
v.
G. SLADE SCHUSTER AND OTHERS.
Nos. 37,943, 37,944.
Supreme Court of Minnesota.
November 10, 1960.
Best, Flanagan, Lewis, Simonet & Bellows and Archibald Spencer, for appellants.
Dorsey, Owen, Barber, Marquart & Windhorst, David R. Brink, and Robert L. Crosby, for respondent trustees.
Richard Siegel, for respondent William J. Mayo II.
Roderick D. Peck, pro se, for guardian ad litem of unknown and incompetent beneficiaries.
DELL, CHIEF JUSTICE.
Appeals from orders of the district…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Village of Aurora v. Commissioner of TaxationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- Hartzell v. SchusterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- In Re Trusteeship Under Will of JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
- Peters v. UelandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Stanton v. Wells Fargo Bank & Union Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1957
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Toombs v. DanielsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Davison v. Duke UniversitySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- In re the Pamela Andreas Stisser Grantor TrustSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- Matter of Great Northern Iron Ore PropertiesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Duemeland v. NorbackNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.