Legal Opinion

Stanton v. Wells Fargo Bank & Union Trust Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 10, 1957No. Civ. 17289PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.

A testamentary trust expressly limited the trustees in investing and reinvesting the trust property to the purchase of certain types of bonds. This action was brought to secure a modification of this provision so as to permit the trustees to invest and reinvest in those securities permitted by section 2261 of the Civil Code.

The action was initiated by three of the four life beneficiaries of a trust created by the will of Sanford Sachs, who died in 1931. The estate was distributed in July of 1936. Under the terms of the decree of final distribution, the residue of the estate was distributed to…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Loring v. Town of KingsleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Bright v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Moxley v. Title Insurance & Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Estate of Van DeusenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Adams v. CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Hartzell v. SchusterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  2. Cocke v. Duke UniversitySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  3. In Re Trusteeship Under Agreement With MayoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  4. Estate of TraungCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  5. Crocker-Citizens National Bank v. YoungerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API