Legal Opinion
Hartzell v. Schuster
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided November 10, 1960No. Nos. 37,943, 37,944PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Dell, Chief Justice.
Appeals from orders of the district court denying the petitions of Esther Mayo Hartzell, as beneficiary, for orders authorizing the trustees of two separate trusts created by the late Dr. Charles H. Mayo on August 17, 1917, and March 28, 1919, to deviate from identical investment restrictions in the trust instruments or to construe the term “other forms of income bearing property” as used therein as authorizing investment of trust funds in corporate stock. The donor died May 26, 1939.
The petitions were opposed by the trustees. Roderick D. Peck was appointed guardian ad…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Village of Aurora v. Commissioner of TaxationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- In Re Trusteeship Under Will of JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
- Peters v. UelandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Stanton v. Wells Fargo Bank & Union Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1957
- In Re Trust Created by Will of CrosbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Toombs v. DanielsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Robert B. Dennis, Etc. v. Rhode Island Hospital Trust National Bank, Robert B. Dennis, Etc. v. Rhode Island Hospital Trust National BankCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
- Davison v. Duke UniversitySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- In re the Pamela Andreas Stisser Grantor TrustSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- In Re Trusteeship Under Agreement With MayoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.