Legal Opinion

Duemeland v. Norback

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 25, 2003No. 20020124PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1] Judith Norback appealed from a summary judgment declaring George Duemeland to be the sole beneficiary under a Trust Agreement creating the Olga Duemeland Irrevocable Trust and under Lorin Duemeland’s will. We hold the Trust Agreement and Lorin Duemeland’s will are ambiguous, and we reverse and remand for further proceedings.

I

[¶ 2] Norback and George Duemeland are the children of Lorin and Olga Dueme-land, and the question in this case involves the distribution of property in the Olga Duemeland Irrevocable Trust, which requires the interpretation of the Trust…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hofsommer v. Hofsommer Excavating, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Current Technology Concepts, Inc. v. Irie Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  3. Bush v. CrowtherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
  4. In Re Declaration of Trust by BushSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
  5. Hartzell v. SchusterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Alerus Financial, N.A. v. Western State BankNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Hoffner v. JohnsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Langer v. PenderNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Hale v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Kappenman v. KlipfelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API